This is all from a new-ish poster on the ex board.
I believe any religion believing they are the true way, and have a duty to convert as many as possible, are potentially dangerous. Especially in authoritarian societies. You are right about the crusades, etc. They completely ignored the teachings of Jesus. I am glad for Luther and the protestant rebellion, and eventual democracy and human rights. Otherwise we might still have crusades and inquisitions.
But how about the inquisitions, and other atrocities? They systematically set out to destroy Paganism (any religion other than their version of Christianity) and they almost accomplished it. Their own Catholic Encyclopedia admits this. Thousands or more were killed in the process. Centuries later they reportedly killed the first two people trying to get the New Testament out to the general public.
They also got rid of Christian writing that didn't agree with them. These are the reasons I don't trust the N.T. to be an accurate representation of Jesus and his movement.
Huh??
I didn't look at the book you mention, but did look at catholic and non catholic resources while doing my study. Consulted the Catholic Encyclopedia many times. It was very interesting to see the spin Catholics can put on their info. I even dug into some Vatican info on some original official documents. After comparing the different sides of issues, came down on the side of non-Catholic historians.
Which non-Catholic historians? Ohhh, you mean the ANTI-Catholic ones, riiiiight.










